# Pyth Token Phase 2 **URL:** \ **Category:** Ideas Bank\ **Created:** [November 28, 2025, 11:18am UTC](https://forum.pyth.network/t/pyth-token-phase-2/2284 "2025-11-28T11:18:25Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 29
**Author:** ![KemarTiti](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/flex001/user_avatar/forum.pyth.network/kemartiti/32/5_2.png) [@KemarTiti](https://forum.pyth.network/u/KemarTiti)\ **Post date:** [December 16, 2025, 1:36pm UTC](https://forum.pyth.network/t/pyth-token-phase-2/2284/29 "2025-12-16T13:36:33Z")
> [@arguer](#): > > There’s definitely some degree of this already happening - like Pyth’s presence and representation at blockchain events/conferences, etc. Are those funded by Douro Labs or PDA? Would direct funding from the DAO make more sense for certain types of brand-building efforts, and perhaps grow Pyth’s brand more effectively in the web2/tradfi realm? Both. If you’re a contributor to PDA, PDA covers, if you’re from Douro Labs, DL covers. But overall the majority of the marketing stems from the PDA as it’s sole purpose is to grow the network adoption, brand awareness and further the self-sustainability of the Pyth Network. On the latter part, isn’t the Community Council with some initiatives like [this one](https://forum.pyth.network/t/community-project-wheel-of-pyth/2268/21) or [this other](https://forum.pyth.network/t/pyth-price-feed-twitter-tg-bot-proposal/2298), good first steps? They are only starting/getting designed so maybe should see their impacts and reassessing? > [@scp](#): > > I understand the need for revenue optimization, but I think pricing needs to be balanced with ecosystem health. Wholeheartedly agree. > [@scp](#): > > Recently I saw Pyth added push-oracle support to several chains. If the intention is to expand push-oracle coverage, that might help reduce costs for certain integrators — but more clarity on rollout strategy would be helpful. So these pushed feeds are operated by Network contributors (i.e. Pyth Data Association) but are not subsidized. Costs are borne by the requestors. This aims more to offload the infrastructure workload on apps, not the cost. > [@scp](#): > > Perhaps the DAO could allocate a portion of revenue to fund game developers or community builders who want to experiment with PYTH-based mini-apps. I think this should pass through (if at all) via the Community Council. The DAO itself shouldn’t be/act as a VC, especially in an industry where 99% of the projects fail to sustain medium term traction. Rephrased, for now, I’d prefer the DAO buying PYTH tokens than most likely losing some acquired revenues for experiments. But again, the Pythentity and others similar projects (TG bot), may very well be worth it, and should draft their proposal on the forum. And then, DAO members can see if this would be coming from the CC or instead the DAO Treasury itself. --- _[View the full topic](https://forum.pyth.network/t/pyth-token-phase-2/2284)._