On a separate note, regarding this point:
dApps can pay in PYTH itself for a discount, increasing demand as usage scales.
It is an idea that has been floated around several times, and I want to take the opportunity to share my thoughts, and invite others to share theirs.
I understand the intent to give the PYTH token more utility, increasing demand and buying pressure, etc. However, I see some issues with the mechanics of that system, based on this flow of thought:
- We (Pyth supporters, token holders, data publishers, community, team, etc.) want to see the value/price of PYTH appreciate over time, since it is one of the main quantitative measures of the value of the Pyth Network.
- If the PYTH token price increases, and fees are paid in PYTH, this means that the dollar cost of fees also goes up for data consumers, which would negate any discounts.
- From the perspective of data consumers, the increase in PYTH token price becomes unfavorable to them, and there is no alignment of interests, specifically pertaining to point 1 above.
In my opinion, there has to be a better system that aligns the interests of all stakeholders, while bringing in value to the entire Pyth Ecosystem. I shared an idea about this several months ago (Implement a rank-based fee discount system for data consumers staking Pyth tokens ($PYTH)), but there are also gaps in that idea - the main issue being the fact that data consumers are often the end-users themselves, therefore making it impractical to implement such a discount system.