I agree with @amensch that Pyth should consider all verticals, and we should not limit ourselves to certain market segments. The proposal seems focused on clients like banks, asset managers, and trading firms (though I understand those may just be examples). If not already considered, another segment worth exploring is trading brokerages.
Brokerages currently rely on multiple data sources for prices, including SIP feeds, direct exchange feeds, and third-party vendors. While some of these may be required by regulations, Pyth’s new product may be attractive as a supplemental source, especially since brokerages are eager to expand into crypto and other asset classes.
Positioning Pyth as a strategic data partner for fast-growing brokerages could strengthen brand reputation and credibility. Arguably, this could be a bigger benefit than the revenue these partnerships might bring. While not the largest by AUA/AUM, these brokerages are good candidates for potential partners due to their rapid growth and consumer-friendly branding (in these respective regions): US: Robinhood, EU: eToro, Asia: Moomoo.
This idea was partly inspired by @PilotSB, who had suggested the idea of partnership with Moomoo (on Discord).