Sounds like a very good proposal ngl
1 Like
Sent it!
This will bring the Solana ecosystem closer together.
1 Like
is there anything with our staking PYTH power here?
Agree with this completely.
sorry, i’m not dev. Just expressing a concern… In web 2 the original domain owner owns the subdomains right? Who would own my pyth.sol subdomain? me or whoever owns the pyth.sol domain (C85iXvCHWCBZXko5NZ97n1AkeaW9o8akciLRH9ww1R43) ?
2 Likes
@KemarTiti explained this well earlier
So the council would be the owner of the pyth subdomain
Oh ok so i wouldn’t own it, but the DAO would. Centralised with sub domains owned by Pyth DAO. I’d be ok with this i guess…
4 Likes
This isn’t correct. The subdomain will be owned by the user who registered it not the Pyth DAO.
17 Likes
Sorry for misunderstanding, “So the council would be the owner of the pyth subdomain”. I don’t think i’d bother to be honest. To much confusion
1 Like
The subdomain is owned by whoever registers it. Not the Pyth DAO/Council or anyone else. It works exactly like a .sol domain, it’s owned by whoever registers it.
29 Likes
vote for pyth.sol
4 Likes
love that！Let’s choose pyth.sol
3 Likes
I think sns has good performance on solana chains, even multichains, so I prefer pyth.sol
7 Likes
Can’t agree with more
5 Likes
pyth x .sol the blue chips of solana unite!
12 Likes
why? .pyth is cleaner
8 Likes
I agree, let’s do .pyth with SNS
1 Like
GM. .sol domainerrrrrrrrr
Couldn’t agree with more. Gaby bro 
1 Like
yes!! bonfida ftw.
4 Likes