What is the reason for the existence of 10 billion of these coins? It is also questionable that as much as 20% of the volume is released into the market annually over such a short period. Furthermore, driven by numerous rewards, a massive volume of sell orders floods the market every month. Due to excessive inflation, this coin has been continuously declining since its listing. Look at this coin’s chart. Is this truly considering the investors? With the continuous crash, all investors are in a state of despair.
Some people say, “The market conditions weren’t good.” Conversely, what was the price like when market conditions were good?
Experiencing this situation, I feel that we were merely tools to fund them.
The amount they purchase each month is a minuscule fraction of the market capitalization, and since even that can be released back into the market at any time, the fundamental problem remains unresolved.
The company’s actions and the coin’s price are moving in the exact opposite direction. As the issuer, they need to identify the cause of the continuous price decline and make improvements. All investors are suffering losses. Please take the value of investors’ money seriously.
Douro Labs July 2026 report: $562k gross revenue → $340k (7.66M PYTH at $0.0444 TWAP) transferred to the DAO. Douro retains ~$222k. ARR now reported at $7.49M in July, +22% MoM, with 51 new paid conversions adding >$1.5M ARR - which sounds great increase.
July PYTH Purchases Report: Council executed the usual 1/3 treasury buyback - community tracking suggests ~9M PYTH range. Yet still just a small fraction of circulating supply…
My honest questions:
Does Douro Labs disclose (or can the Council confirm) whether the PYTH used for the monthly distributions is newly acquired on the market, from existing holdings, or a mix? Any hedging policy?
With ARR now at $7.49M and growing, at what revenue scale do the 1/3 buybacks become large enough relative to residual unlock/sell pressure to stabilize or reverse the multi-month downtrend?
Is there any plan to increase the buyback percentage, add a permanent burn component to reduce 10B, or otherwise tighten the link between protocol revenue and net supply reduction beyond the current Reserve accumulation?