Community Council Term 2 Budget Request

Community Council Term 2 Budget Proposal

Summary

We’re requesting 8,000,000 PYTH over 12 months (~666,667 PYTH/month or $328,000 as of March 25th, 2026) for Community Council Term 2.

Term 2 matches the budget to real program costs AND adds the unified content creation engine as the major new initiative, replacing Kaito and Impact Awards for a more direct, value added content creation mechanism that is more in line with the development of the broader crypto ecosystem.


Why 8M PYTH?

Term 1 Proved the Model Worked, but Required Refinement

Council term #1 burn rate was relatively low and reflected the real cost of operating community programs (Impact Awards, Kaito, council stipends, experiments). With Kaito winding down, the council has collectively researched and built a new Kaito-esque program that is better designed and refined to achieve very specific reach goals on socials.

Key cost drivers that grew during Term 1:

  • Kaito: Grew from 35,000 → 234,000 PYTH/month as the platform received more attention. The platform crashed and burned, and no longer exists.

  • Impact Awards: Consistent monthly distribution to 40+ contributors. Quality diminished over time as ‘farmers’ discovered ways to take advantage of the system.

  • Experiments Lab: Funded community development (Community Ops, Pythentity)

Term 2 Consolidates and Scales

The old budget categories — Role Stipends, Impact Awards, Kaito, Experiments Lab — are being replaced by a unified system. Impact Awards, the Clipping Program, and MissionMonitor are no longer separate line items. They’re one content creation engine:

Missions (MissionMonitor) → Content Creation → Clipping (PythClippers) → Referrals → Rewards

6M of the 8M PYTH budget flows through this unified engine. This is a consolidation of many different programs under a single unified banner that can be closely monitored. Three programs that previously had separate budgets, separate tracking, and separate oversight now run through one system with automated tracking, judging, and treasury export.


Term 2 Budget Breakdown

Category Monthly PYTH Annual PYTH Description
Content Program 500,000 6,000,000 Unified Content Creation Program
Ongoing Hackathon 200,000 400,000 Promoting ongoing Pyth Development and Content Showcases with community builders
Pythentity TBA 200,000 Gamified Community identity layer & Rewards system for Pyth evangelists.
Role Stipends ~46,000 560,000 Role stipends, covering core content and community lore creators.
Council Stipend 10,000 840,000 Council Member Payments for ongoing management.

What Term 2 Funds

1. MissionMonitor Content Engine (Primary Allocation)

The unified system for community content creation, distribution, and rewards.

  • Missions: Campaign briefs distributed via Telegram + Discord. Community creates content around Pyth milestones, launches, partnerships, and product updates.

  • Clipping Program: MissionMonitor bot handles submission tracking and leaderboards for socials content. 134+ video transcripts ready for clipping alongside a comprehensive content guidebook.

  • Referrals: Built-in referral system with attribution tracking, 10% referrer split, and 90-day expiry. Incentivizes community growth through content participation.

  • Soft Identity Gating: All programs can be gated through Pythentity for sybil resistance. Verified contributors & Pyth evangelists receive preferential treatment.

Infrastructure already built: MissionMonitor (live), Referrals System (90% complete), Pythentity (MVP live), Google Sheets export (live).

2. Pyth Playground (Vibecodeathon)

Recurring 6-week community hackathon for builders of all skill levels. AI-assisted “vibe coding” format lowers barriers. Each submission creates public content pieces (GEO requirements built in).

  • Round 1 currently live with active submissions

  • Target: 3–5 rounds in Term 2

  • Prize pool: ~200,000 PYTH per round

  • Confirmed judges from Community Council

3. Pythentity (Identity Layer)

Community-native identity and reputation system. Wallet verification + Discord OAuth + NFT gating + behavioral scoring. Gates all incentive programs for sybil resistance.

Term 2 scope:

  • Cross Chain & additional wallet support.

  • Cross-platform identity bridge (Discord + Telegram + Forum)

  • Integration with PythClippers and MissionMonitor for automatic score updates

  • Domain migration + repo transfer

  • Process remaining grant funds


Term 1 Financial Transparency

Full actuals from Google Sheet — Full breakdown.

Cycle 1 (April – September 2025)

Category Budget Spent Remaining
Role Stipends 120,000 155,718 -35,718
Impact Awards 210,000 224,396 -14,396
Kaito 1,000,000 477,887 522,113
Experiments Lab 90,000 44,180 45,820
Council Stipend 420,000 420,000 0
Total 1,840,000 1,322,181 517,819

Cycle 2 (October 2025 – March 2026)

Category Budget Spent Remaining
Role Stipends 120,000 284,140 -164,140
Impact Awards 210,000 189,524 20,476
Kaito 600,000 1,015,871 -415,871
Experiments Lab 480,000 403,800 76,200
Council Stipend 420,000 420,000* 0
Contingency 60,000 35,050 24,950
Total 1,890,000 2,348,384 -458,384

*Council Stipend is paid directly from the DAO treasury to council members — not from the council multisig. This avoids a conflict of interest (council members don’t pay themselves). Cycle 2 stipend is committed but not yet disbursed.

Key takeaway: Kaito alone consumed 53% of total Term 1 spend and exceeded its Cycle 2 budget by 415K PYTH. Role Stipends also exceeded budget in both cycles as the community role system expanded. Council Stipend shows 0 spent because stipends are paid directly by the DAO to avoid a conflict of interest — council members don’t pay themselves from their own multisig.


Governance & Accountability

Reporting

  • Quarterly budget reports posted to forum with PYTH spent per category

  • Quarterly reviews with program metrics (participation, content output, community growth)

  • All operational tooling (MissionMonitor, PythClippers) produces auditable logs

  • Google Sheets treasury tracker publicly viewable

Unused Funds

  • All unused funds return to the DAO treasury. No rollover, no discretionary holdback.

  • Term 1 wallet currently holds 376,480.91 PYTH. Remaining funds may be used during the interim period to bridge into Term 2 content programs, avoiding dead time between budget approval and program launch. Any balance beyond interim operations returns to the DAO.

Funding Source

  • DAO treasury, executed via binding governance proposal

  • Funds transfer is automatic upon proposal execution


What’s Different About Term 2

Term 1 Term 2
Built MissionMonitor Run missions at scale on MissionMonitor
Built PythClippers Launch clipping program with dedicated PYTH pool
Built Pythentity MVP Gate all incentive programs through Pythentity
Separate budgets for Impact Awards, Kaito, Experiments Lab Unified content creation engine — one system, one budget
35K PYTH/month approved budget Right-sized to actual operational costs
Programs built Programs running

The infrastructure is built. The strategy is documented. The tools are operational. Term 2 is about making these systems produce results at scale.


Conclusion

Term 1 built the infrastructure. Term 2 runs the machine.

The Community Council exists to make Pyth’s community a genuine competitive advantage — verified contributors who know the product, build with the data, and produce content that compounds in value. The unified content creation engine (MissionMonitor + PythClippers + Pythentity) is how we do that at scale with proper accountability.

Requesting approval for a 12-month budget of 8,000,000 PYTH (4,000,000 PYTH per 6-month cycle). Cycle 2 allocation may be adjusted based on PYTH price at the time of renewal.


Questions? Tag the Community Council in Discord or comment on this proposal.

10 Likes

Great news. I was incredibly frustrated with the farmers and I’d love to weed out everyone who’s just farming rewards. The larger budget provides more opportunities , everything built in Term 1 needs to be scaled, and it’s time to keep pushing forward.

The only thing that worries me is the referral program. For some reason, it’s an immediate red flag for me. It could potentially bring in people who will just abuse the system and invite low-quality users. But I think the scoring system will be able to handle it

4 Likes

getting hot on transperancy, another banger ser chop